Facebook makes its privacy settings act more like Google+ Skip to main content

Facebook makes its privacy settings act more like Google+

(CNN) -- When Google's not-the-Facebook social network, Google Plus, launched earlier this summer, one thing stood out for many tech pundits: privacy settings.

On Facebook, users had to navigate confusing lists on settings pages in order to control seemingly simple and important things, like who could see their photos or status updates or which books they like.

Google Plus made such decisions easier since it let users decide who would receive a given post or photo right when they created and then posted it.

Facebook seems to have taken notice of this subtle but significant difference. The world's largest social network on Tuesday announced changes to its privacy settings that allow users to choose who will see a photo or status update right when they post it -- much like was already the case on Google Plus.

"You have told us that 'who can see this?' could be clearer across Facebook, so we have made changes to make this more visual and straightforward," Facebook's Chris Cox writes in a blog post on the topic.

"The main change is moving most of your controls from a settings page to being inline, right next to the posts, photos and tags they affect. Plus there are several other updates here that will make it easier to understand who can see your stuff (or your friends') in any context."

An example will help make sense of all this social-media-speak.

Say you want to post a photo from a friend's recent birthday party -- and you only want your good friends to be able to see it.

Before, you would need to go to Facebook's "Edit Friends" page. Then you'd need to set up a list of your Facebook friends who you consider to be "good friends." That can take a while. Then you assign certain properties to that group, allowing them to see photos or status updates or wall posts made by other friends etc. Instead of deciding which pieces of content these people will see, you choose the category.

Confusing much?

After the change, Facebook users decide who gets to see a photo right as they post it. Right next to the "post" button on Facebook, which users click to post something new to the site, there's a little lock icon. Click on that and you can choose where to send that post. Click "customize" to get the most control.

Google Plus is similar, but it uses friend "circles" instead of "lists."

In comments on Facebook's blog post about the privacy change, some users said they were impressed: "Well done, slowly getting better," one wrote.

Many, however, referenced Google's new-ish social network.

"Glad to see that competition is finally forcing Facebook to improve," one person wrote.

"Looks like, FB is transforming to G+..." wrote another.

And there were more than a few jokes in the comments, too: "hahahaha... if you want this functionality, and want it to actually work, just use Google+!"

Tech pundit Robert Scoble chimed in, too:

"It effectively will keep people from moving to Google+ because it takes away many of the advantages of Google+ Circles."

There were some other Facebook privacy changes, too. Among them:

-- Users now can approve photo tags before they go onto their News Feeds, where friends would see them. Before, friends could identify you in a photo without your knowledge and post that on the network.

-- A button called "view profile as..." now appears in the top right corner of Facebook profiles. Click it and then enter a name of a friend or co-worker to see what your profile looks like when they view it.

-- Users can change the visibility of a post after it's up.

-- Facebook now says "public" instead of "everyone" in its privacy-setting lingo. Both terms mean everyone on the public Internet -- not just friends or other Facebook users -- can see that piece of content.

What do you think of these changes? Let us know in the comments.

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/TECH/social.media/08/23/facebook.privacy.change/index.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chronology of the Press in Burma

1836 – 1846 * During this period the first English-language newspaper was launched under British-ruled Tenasserim, southern  Burma . The first ethnic Karen-language and Burmese-language newspapers also appear in this period.     March 3, 1836 —The first English-language newspaper,  The Maulmain Chronicle , appears in the city of Moulmein in British-ruled Tenasserim. The paper, first published by a British official named E.A. Blundell, continued up until the 1950s. September 1842 —Tavoy’s  Hsa-tu-gaw  (the  Morning Star ), a monthly publication in the Karen-language of  Sgaw ,  is established by the Baptist mission. It is the first ethnic language newspaper. Circulation reached about three hundred until its publication ceased in 1849. January 1843 —The Baptist mission publishes a monthly newspaper, the Christian  Dhamma  Thadinsa  (the  Religious Herald ), in Moulmein. Supposedly the first Burmese-language newspaper, it continued up until the first year of the second Angl

ARSA claims ambush on Myanmar security forces

Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) on Sunday claimed responsibility for an ambush on Myanmar security forces that left several wounded in northern Rakhine state, the first attack in weeks in a region gutted by violence. Rakhine was plunged into turmoil last August, when a series of ARSA raids prompted a military backlash so brutal the UN says it likely amounts to ethnic cleansing of the Muslim Rohingya minority. The army campaign sent some 650,000 Rohingya fleeing for Bangladesh, where refugees have given harrowing accounts of rape, murder and arson at the hands of security forces and vigilantes. Myanmar's military, which tightly controls information about Rakhine, denies any abuses and insists the crackdown was a proportionate response to crush the "terrorist" threat. ARSA have launched few attacks in recent months.  But the army reported that "about ten" Rohingya terrorists ambushed a car with hand-made mines and gunfire on Friday morning

Thai penis whitening trend raises eyebrows

Image copyright LELUXHOSPITAL Image caption Authorities warn the procedure could be quite painful A supposed trend of penis whitening has captivated Thailand in recent days and left it asking if the country's beauty industry is taking things too far. Skin whitening is nothing new in many Asian countries, where darker skin is often associated with outdoor labour, therefore, being poorer. But even so, when a clip of a clinic's latest intriguing procedure was posted online, it quickly went viral. Thailand's health ministry has since issued a warning over the procedure. The BBC Thai service spoke to one patient who had undergone the treatment, who told them: "I wanted to feel more confident in my swimming briefs". The 30-year-old said his first session of several was two months ago, and he had since seen a definite change in the shade. 'What for?' The original Facebook post from the clinic offering the treatment, which uses lasers to break do