Taliban rule out negotiations with Nato Skip to main content

Taliban rule out negotiations with Nato

Soldiers in Helmand province June has been the deadliest month for Nato forces so far
The Taliban in Afghanistan have told the BBC that there is no question of their entering into any kind of negotiations with Nato forces.

It comes after US commanders and the British army chief of staff, Gen David Richards, suggested that it might be useful to talk to the Taliban.
The Taliban statement is uncompromising, almost contemptuous.
They believe they are winning the war, and cannot see why they should help Nato by talking to them.
They assume, perhaps wrongly, that the Americans are in disarray after the sacking of the Nato commander Gen Stanley McChrystal last week, and regard any suggestion that they should enter negotiations with them as a sign of Nato's own weakness.
June, they point out, has seen the highest number of Nato deaths in Afghanistan: 102, an average of more than three a day.
'Differences' Nowadays it is extremely hard for Westerners to meet Taliban leaders face to face, either in Afghanistan or in Pakistan.
Gen David Petraeus is set to brief Nato allies in Brussels - and all have a lot riding on the new commander
Nick Childs BBC defence correspondent New US chief to brief Nato allies
But a trusted intermediary conveyed a series of questions to Zabiullah Mujahedd, the acknowledged spokesman for the Afghan Taliban leadership, and gave us his answers.
The text runs as follows:
"We do not want to talk to anyone - not to [President Hamid] Karzai, nor to any foreigners - till the foreign forces withdraw from Afghanistan.
"We are certain that we are winning. Why should we talk if we have the upper hand, and the foreign troops are considering withdrawal, and there are differences in the ranks of our enemies?"
Why should we talk if we have the upper hand, and the foreign troops are considering withdrawal, and there are differences in the ranks of our enemies?
Zabiullah Mujahedd Taliban spokesman
This is propaganda, of course - yet many Afghans, even those who hate and fear the Taliban, are coming round to exactly the same view.
The Taliban are still deeply unpopular in many parts of the country.
Memories are still vivid of the brutal and extreme way they governed from 1996 to 2001.
They, together with their supporters, certainly do not represent anything near a majority of the Afghan people.
'Instinctive dislike' They are still predominantly a Pashtu faction, and when they were in power they caused much anger by imposing Pashtu cultural norms on the complex and varied peoples of Afghanistan.
Nevertheless, there is an instinctive and widespread dislike of having foreign troops, and especially non-Muslim ones, based in Afghanistan.
Village elders sit before the start of a shura meeting with local 
Afghan government officials and officers from the US Many Afghans do not support the Taliban People who do not support the Taliban know that the Nato-led force is preventing the Taliban from returning to power.
But the dislike of occupying forces goes very deep.
The key to the Taliban's remarkable success in capturing Kabul from the more moderate mujahideen leadership in 1996 was their ability to convince dozens of uncommitted warlords that they were bound to win.
Many of these warlords were not themselves Pashtun, and often were not extreme Muslims.
They joined the Taliban simply to be on the winning side.
The Taliban have not forgotten this. If they can convince people that they are beating the British and Americans, more and more local warlords will join their cause.
Petraeus' challenge The difficult job facing Gen Petraeus, who takes over control of the Nato forces in Afghanistan, will be to change this perception.
When he was in charge of coalition forces in Iraq he managed to change the widespread perception that the war there was unwinnable.
He presented the draw-down of US forces as a victory: they had, he said, done the job they had come to do, and succeeded. Therefore they could leave Iraq as victors.
Gen David Petraeus, commander of US forces in Afghanistan Gen Petraeus has warned of an escalation of violence Cynics may point out that the number of deaths from terrorism in Iraq is still appallingly high, and that the fragile Iraqi government is struggling to do anything about it.
But since most American news organisations have pulled out of Baghdad, little news of what is happening in Iraq seeps through to the United States.
Gen Petraeus will no doubt try to replicate his remarkable Iraqi success in Afghanistan.
Yet it will be harder, and doubts about the value of the operation are already growing in every Nato country.
His main aim will be to reverse the growing belief in Afghanistan that the Americans, the British and the others will pull out soon, and leave the country to fight out its own war - with the Taliban the likely winners.
It is likely to be the hardest fight of his career.

BBC

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chronology of the Press in Burma

1836 – 1846 * During this period the first English-language newspaper was launched under British-ruled Tenasserim, southern  Burma . The first ethnic Karen-language and Burmese-language newspapers also appear in this period.     March 3, 1836 —The first English-language newspaper,  The Maulmain Chronicle , appears in the city of Moulmein in British-ruled Tenasserim. The paper, first published by a British official named E.A. Blundell, continued up until the 1950s. September 1842 —Tavoy’s  Hsa-tu-gaw  (the  Morning Star ), a monthly publication in the Karen-language of  Sgaw ,  is established by the Baptist mission. It is the first ethnic language newspaper. Circulation reached about three hundred until its publication ceased in 1849. January 1843 —The Baptist mission publishes a monthly newspaper, the Christian  Dhamma  Thadinsa  (the  Religious Herald ), in Moulmein. Supposedly the first Burmese-language newspaper, it continued up until the first year of the second Angl

ARSA claims ambush on Myanmar security forces

Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) on Sunday claimed responsibility for an ambush on Myanmar security forces that left several wounded in northern Rakhine state, the first attack in weeks in a region gutted by violence. Rakhine was plunged into turmoil last August, when a series of ARSA raids prompted a military backlash so brutal the UN says it likely amounts to ethnic cleansing of the Muslim Rohingya minority. The army campaign sent some 650,000 Rohingya fleeing for Bangladesh, where refugees have given harrowing accounts of rape, murder and arson at the hands of security forces and vigilantes. Myanmar's military, which tightly controls information about Rakhine, denies any abuses and insists the crackdown was a proportionate response to crush the "terrorist" threat. ARSA have launched few attacks in recent months.  But the army reported that "about ten" Rohingya terrorists ambushed a car with hand-made mines and gunfire on Friday morning

Thai penis whitening trend raises eyebrows

Image copyright LELUXHOSPITAL Image caption Authorities warn the procedure could be quite painful A supposed trend of penis whitening has captivated Thailand in recent days and left it asking if the country's beauty industry is taking things too far. Skin whitening is nothing new in many Asian countries, where darker skin is often associated with outdoor labour, therefore, being poorer. But even so, when a clip of a clinic's latest intriguing procedure was posted online, it quickly went viral. Thailand's health ministry has since issued a warning over the procedure. The BBC Thai service spoke to one patient who had undergone the treatment, who told them: "I wanted to feel more confident in my swimming briefs". The 30-year-old said his first session of several was two months ago, and he had since seen a definite change in the shade. 'What for?' The original Facebook post from the clinic offering the treatment, which uses lasers to break do